3 min read · 1 small stepSkip to today’s step →

A deal you didn't need is not a saving

The extreme-couponing hauls on TV are gone. Many people say the truth that outlasts them: a deal you did not need is not a saving.

Drawn from people talking about extreme couponing. The loophole tactics appear only as the myths people correct.

The advert, the coupon, the flash sale all say the same thing — buy this and you will save — and it is easy to end up with a cupboard full of things you never wanted, feeling like you came out ahead. People are the source here.

A deal on something you did not need is not a saving; it is spending, however large the discount, and the trolley-loads of nearly-free goods from the television are gone.

The easy era is over

Many people say the extreme couponing of the early 2010s — the stacked coupons, the loopholes, the trolley for a few coins — no longer exists, because retailers and manufacturers closed the loopholes, capped the cash back and limited redemptions once the practice became famous. Some people add that the television shows hurt it, by exposing the fraud and triggering the crackdown, and one person says much of what they showed was staged. What replaced it, the first question below explains, is digital and modest: your shop’s own app and loyalty scheme, easier than paper and real, but small. Chasing the old version now is chasing something that is gone.

A deal is only a saving on what you would buy anyway

This is the line people put at the centre. Many people say a discount is no saving at all when you would not otherwise have bought the thing — buying it is spending money you would have kept, and the discount is only the bait. Extreme couponing so often ends in the opposite of thrift: closets of food and toiletries bought because they were cheap, much of it unused, some of it spoiled. The second question below gives the test: decide what you actually need and use, then let coupons lower the price of those, and never let a coupon decide the need. A closet of things you did not want is a loss that looks like a win.

The time is part of the price

Some people say the hours of finding, clipping, sorting and driving are themselves a cost, and that once the easy savings ended, that time stopped paying for itself. Put your own time into the sum, not just the money. The third question, and the fork below, carry the sharper version — where people disagree about whether the pursuit is sensible frugality or a compulsion that keeps going after the savings have stopped making sense.

What saves now, and what to do with the rest

The saving that survives is small and dull and works: use your regular shop’s app, loyalty scheme and codes on the things already on your list, timed to when they are on sale, at almost no cost in time. The fourth question adds two honest notes: if you end up with a surplus, give it to a food bank rather than let it expire, and drop the well-meant habit of leaving coupons beside the product, because staff are told to bin them and they cause more trouble than they save. The deals are worth having only when they serve the shopping you were going to do anyway.

The community disagrees on this one

Is chasing coupons and deals a sensible frugal habit or a compulsion? One disagreement is closely split, and people call it context-dependent: it turns on whether the deals serve you or you serve them.

It is rational frugality

Some people say that for a household that plans, buys what it uses, and treats couponing as one tool among several, it is a sensible way to lower the bill on real needs — a stockpile of things you genuinely go through is money well spent, not hoarding.

It becomes a compulsion

Some people say the pursuit often outlives the saving — the hunt becomes the point, the stockpile grows past what any household will use, and the closet of unused goods is a habit dressed as thrift.

What decides it, in their words, is whether the deals serve you — lowering the cost of what you already need and use — or you serve them, buying and storing for the feeling of the win. The same trolley of cheap goods is thrift for the household that eats it and clutter for the one that does not.

Common questions

Can I still save a fortune with coupons like the TV shows?

No, and people are clear that this is the first thing to understand. The era those shows captured — roughly the early 2010s, when stacking coupons and loopholes could fill a trolley for almost nothing — is over, and many people say why: retailers and manufacturers watched the same shows, saw the losses, and closed the loopholes, capped the cash back, limited how many identical coupons you could redeem, and tightened the rules. Some people add that the shows themselves hurt the practice, because they exposed the fraud and the loopholes and triggered exactly the crackdown that ended them, and one person says the shows were largely faked, with producers supplying the coupons and arranging the trips. What replaced it, many people say, is digital: your supermarket's own app, loyalty card and personalised email codes, which are far easier than clipping paper but give smaller discounts. So the honest picture is real savings, modest ones, on the things you already buy — not a lifestyle that turns groceries free. Chasing the television version now is chasing something that no longer exists, and the one person here that tried describes waste, financial strain and resentment as what it got from it.

How do I tell a real saving from a fake one?

One test, and it is the most important line here: would you have bought this thing anyway, at its normal price, if there were no deal? If yes, a coupon or a sale on it is a genuine saving. If no, then buying it is not saving money at all — it is spending money you would otherwise have kept, and the discount is the bait that got you to spend it. Many people make this point, because extreme couponing so often ends in the opposite of thrift: cupboards and garages full of processed food, toiletries and cleaning products bought because they were cheap, much of it never used, some of it going off before it can be. A saving that leaves you with a closet of things you did not want is a loss with a receipt that looks like a win. So the discount is the last thing to look at, not the first: decide what you actually need and use, and then let coupons and sales lower the price of those — never let the coupon decide the need. That one question is the habit people keep coming back to.

Isn't it worth the time if it saves money?

Often not, and the people who did it seriously are the ones who say so. Some people point out that the hours spent finding, clipping, sorting and driving to redeem coupons are themselves a cost, and that once the easy loopholes closed, that time stopped paying for itself — many experienced couponers describe giving up the complex strategies for simple ones precisely because the return no longer justified the effort. Put your own time into the sum, in other words, not just the money: an afternoon spent chasing a few pounds off is an afternoon, and people are honest that it is rarely a good trade once the savings are ordinary rather than extreme. The fork below carries the sharper version of this, where people disagree about whether the pursuit is sensible frugality or something closer to a compulsion — a habit that keeps going after the savings have stopped making sense, for the feeling of the hunt rather than the money. Neither side is wrong for everyone; the useful question is whether the time and the stockpile are serving you, or you are serving them.

So what actually saves money now, and what do I do with a stockpile?

What saves money now is small, digital and boring, and it works: use your regular shop's own app, loyalty scheme and emailed codes, and apply them to the things on your normal list, timed to when those things are on sale. That is the modern remainder of couponing, and people say it is worth doing precisely because it costs almost no time and touches only what you were buying anyway. A few more honest notes from people. If you do end up with a surplus of cheap or free goods — it happens, especially with a good multi-buy — some people say to give the extra to a food bank or shelter rather than let it sit and expire; surplus you will never use is not wealth. And one myth to drop: leaving your spare or expiring coupons beside the product, the well-meant 'coupon fairy' idea, does not help the next person — store staff say they are told to bin them within minutes, and they cause more trouble at the till than they save, from expired dates to wrong-size mismatches. If you want to pass a coupon on, hand it to someone who will use it. One aside people raise: a 'best before' or 'sell by' date is about peak quality, not safety, though a 'use by' date is the one to respect. Which label carries legal weight differs by country; that hedge is this page's, so check your own.

Questions this step helps with

Same situation, another step

What people worked out

Shorter, plainer notes on the same ground — each with the number of people behind it.

a quiet placeSit for a minuteA meadow, a river, and nothing you have to do. The field is always open — and the wind on this page already knows the way.

Heavy moment? Call or text 988 in the US, or call Samaritans on 116 123 in the UK — or, at your pace, someone to talk to →

Close

The lamp is on. Whenever you’re ready:one more small step →someone to talk to →