Let the kids call out the bikes
Make spotting bikes, motorbikes and walkers a car game, and say what you do when you see them. It isn’t proven to last. It costs nothing.
Drawn from parents, riders and drivers talking about a car game for children, with the crossing-the-road advice checked against the UK Highway Code and a US child-safety organisation.
Long drives with children come with a game already half-built: somebody spots something out of the window, and somebody else shouts. This page is about pointing that game at the things on the road that are easy to miss.
On drives with your children, make a game of spotting motorbikes, bicycles and people on foot, and say out loud what you do when you see them, so that looking for small things on the road is normal long before they drive.
Why the small things
Some people give the reason for choosing these targets: a motorbike or a bicycle is harder to see than a car, and more likely to end in serious injury or death if it is hit. The UK Highway Code says the same without the argument: motorcyclists and cyclists are often difficult to see, especially alongside you, coming up from behind, at junctions and roundabouts, and filtering through traffic. It lists them, with people on foot — children and older people in particular — among the road users most at risk.
One person here puts the value of looking in a way worth keeping: the point is noticing the thing that is harder to see, because that prevents a crash no matter who would have been to blame. Some people say they know someone killed or injured riding, and one describes being surprised by bikes appearing suddenly. The second question below takes the objection that motorbikes are too loud to miss.
How the game goes
Many people describe some version of the same game: while you drive, the children score points for spotting things, and motorbikes — sometimes bicycles too — are worth extra. They offer it as a way to build a scanning habit that lasts, and some people say they played something like it growing up. One person clarifies that it is not really I Spy, which is a guessing game; it is a spotting and counting game, and some people say the scoring is hard to follow as described. Make up your own.
Some people say to mix in other targets, such as cows, to keep the children interested — others add wildlife and a particular colour of car — and one person points out the obvious problem otherwise: on some roads there are not many motorbikes to count. Some people use a points table: more for a motorbike, something for an ambulance or a fire engine, a number-plate from far away. One person proposes that lorries should be worth even more, since they are dangerous in their own way. Families here have their own names and rules for it. The children need to be old enough to count or recognise the kinds of vehicle, some people note; what age that is, this page cannot say.
The co-pilot
The game is the first step; some people take it further, to the child as co-pilot, and the first question below is about that. One account adds a lesson from driving instruction worth passing on when they are older: look for cars first and then for bikes, on purpose, because a driver looking for one kind of thing tends not to see the other. Another says to check the mirrors every few seconds, not every couple of minutes. And one person makes the case for starting early at all: if you wait for the driving licence, you have started too late, and another says a stretch of deliberate practice before a new driver takes the wheel lets the habit settle first.
What it cannot promise
Nothing here shows that a car game at seven makes a safer driver at seventeen, and no study of it was checked for this page. People argue about it openly. Some people say the game builds a lasting respect for bikes; one answers that it only trains attention while the game is being played. Three say it is a useful habit to start; one calls it nonsense, and in one discussion people split evenly on whether it is worth a tip at all next to seatbelts and the basics. One person says the games they played helped them avoid hitting animals and other cars as an adult; one couple plays it now to sharpen their own attention. That is the honest weight of it: a cheap habit, some people’s strong belief, and no proof. Seatbelts, one person adds, still come first.
Out of the car
Two habits for when the car stops. When you park by the road, open your door with the hand on the far side — your left hand for a door on your right. The Highway Code says this makes you turn your head and look over your shoulder, so you are less likely to hit a cyclist or motorcyclist coming past, or someone on the pavement; one person here adds that it is mostly about cyclists, who ride close to parked cars. It is a habit children in the back can learn too.
And crossing the road is its own lesson, which this page only touches on; the third question below gives the US and UK advice side by side, because the two countries teach it differently.
Who this page is not for
If what you want is to frighten a child off motorbikes, this page will not help. One person suggests showing teenagers gruesome crash videos, and admits it is an unpopular view; another warns that scare language about riders builds hostility rather than awareness, and one person says that if a child is interested in riding, the better path is to support it with proper training rather than shut it down or mock it. How to handle that moment when your child is old enough to ride is not something this page covers. And people argue at length about whether riders or drivers are to blame for crashes. The game is not a verdict on either: a careful rider and a reckless one are the same small shape in a mirror, and one person notes that even safe riders are hit by drivers who did not look.
Common questions
Won’t I just be teaching them to be backseat drivers?
In a way, yes, and some people say that is the point. Instead of silencing the child who points out a car coming or someone about to cross, they suggest treating them as a co-pilot: let them point out cyclists, people stepping off the kerb, cars pulling out and blind spots, because the habit being built is looking ahead and not trusting anyone else’s attention. One person adds the other half: narrate your own driving — why you are slowing for that cyclist, why you are leaving room for the motorbike, what just startled you — so the reasons stick along with the looking. Two honest limits come from the same conversations. Talking through every decision is tiring for the people listening, one person admits, and the game can be annoying to anyone in the car who is not playing, another says. So keep it light and short, and keep the driving yours: the children do the spotting, and the driver keeps their eyes on the road. How to keep a lively game from pulling at the driver’s attention is not covered here; if it does, stop the game.
Aren’t motorbikes loud enough that nobody misses them?
Some people say so: motorbikes are loud, so you hear them coming. Others answer that the noise is not the same as seeing. One person argues that a loud engine does not tell you where the bike is or how close it is; another that modern cars are quiet inside and shut a lot of road noise out; and a third that the problem is size — a bike is a small shape in a mirror or at a junction whatever it sounds like. The UK Highway Code sides with looking: it says it is often difficult to see motorcyclists and cyclists, especially alongside you, coming up from behind, at junctions and roundabouts, and filtering through traffic, and that you should look out for them before you pull out, because they could be approaching faster than you think. A quiet bicycle is harder still.
What about when they cross the road?
That is a separate lesson, and this page only touches on it, so this answer leans on the road-safety authorities. One person here describes drilling a strict left-right-left routine into a child, with a near miss of their own behind it, and one person points out the catch: in countries that drive on the left, such as the UK, a lifetime’s habit points the wrong way first. The advice differs by country. In the US, a child-safety organisation’s advice is to look left, right and left again, and to keep looking all the way across. In the UK, the Green Cross Code in the Highway Code does not use a left-right order at all: look all around for traffic and listen, because traffic could come from any direction. Some people argue about exactly that — two for a “look all around” that covers cars from odd angles, one for a simple “look both ways” that a small child can hold. What separates them is the child’s age. On age, the US organisation says children under 10 should cross with an adult, because until then they generally cannot judge the speed and distance of cars; the UK code says many children cannot judge that either, and that the parent decides when a child can cross alone. The UK code adds: hold their hands, and keep yourself between them and the traffic. The US organisation adds: make eye contact with drivers before crossing, and put phones and headphones away. And one person here puts the lesson under all of it plainly: teach children that looking out for themselves is their job, not something to leave to drivers.
Questions this step helps with
Same situation, another step
- Replace the helmet that took the hitParenting
Full tip: https://findangel.org/tips/let-the-kids-call-out-the-bikes/ · FindAngel.org — free, always.